iCHSTM 2013 Programme • Version 5.3.6, 27 July 2013 • ONLINE (includes late changes)
Index
| Paper sessions timetable | Lunch and evening timetable | Main site
S110. Homemade science: domestic sites and the gendering of knowledge
Sponsoring body:
DHST Commission on Women and Gender Studies
Wed 24 July, 14:10–17:40 ▪ Roscoe 2.3
Symposium organisers:
Donald Luke Opitz twitter | DePaul University, United States
Brigitte Van Tiggelen | Independent scholar, Belgium
S110-A
Wed 24 July, 14:10–15:40Roscoe 2.3
Chair: Donald Luke Opitz twitter | DePaul University, United States
Staffan Bergwik | Uppsala University, Sweden
Brigitte Van Tiggelen | Independent scholar, Belgium
Helen Anne Curry | University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Carol Morris | University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
S110-B
Wed 24 July, 16:10–17:40Roscoe 2.3
Chair: Brigitte Van Tiggelen | Independent scholar, Belgium
Julie Davies | University of Melbourne, Australia
Katy Price twitter | Queen Mary, University of London, United Kingdom
Claire G Jones | University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Paul White | University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Commentary: Donald Luke Opitz twitter | DePaul University, United States
Symposium abstract

As a robust area for investigating the production of scientific knowledge, the geography of science has been dominated by places like the field, laboratory, marine station, museum, and civic lecture hall. But scientists among these diverse sites uniformly must retire to one common place: the home. How might our accounting of the geography of knowledge-production shift when we add this fundamental institution to the work-lives of scientists? In what ways did the home provide spatial, material, and social resources for the pursuit of science, and how was “homemade science” produced in perhaps distinctive and yet replicable ways? How might the home have spawned distinctive gender meanings and dynamics in knowledge-production? What were the statuses of domestic sites within broader geographies of science?

In this symposium, speakers have been invited to address these questions by examining the status of the domestic production of science in a range of time periods, locations, disciplines, and physical configurations. Individual presentations will pay particular attention to how the gendered meanings and dynamics of scientific work assumed particular forms within domestic settings, and what those forms entailed for scientific outcomes. A commentator for the symposium, as a whole, will draw lessons from the individual cases to suggest how, collectively, the contributions push our historical understanding of the geography of gendered knowledge production.

Location: Roscoe Building 2.3
Part of: Roscoe Building